Re: what exhaust for my 172 malossi or pm59 what i was trying to say is in terms of all round reliability id go for either stock or scorp. neither are faster than the 59 or malossi but they will still be on the bike in a few years time, theyre the least pain in the arse IMO, whereas a pm most likely would of snapped or cracked, cant comment on the malossi as ive never had any experience with them hence i wouldnt go for one over a stock or scorp. this is all IMO of course...
Re: what exhaust for my 172 malossi or pm59 yes i see were your coming from :thumbsup: end of the day its a personal decision and the two different exhaust are purposely built for two different reasons so dependant on what you want from the zorst
Re: what exhaust for my 172 malossi or pm59 just no, theres no reason on the planet to spend 300 quid on a scorp.. ther erestricted to fuck, might aswell have a kundo or technigas.. i agree with stock pipes, but you need to play wiht the rollers if ANY pipe you fitted hasernt made any more power. jolly moto, malossi or pm are the only real 172 based pipes out there. hence thats why its the choice, the scorp is a factory replacment grade part (not a modification) its NOT made to make any power. its made to replace a stock pipe, on a stock engine.
Re: what exhaust for my 172 malossi or pm59 what happend to that broken scorp that was floatin about the form a while back i think it was karl 172's and ther was a restrictor in ther wasnt some one gna take it out weld it up and test it? did this happen and if so how was it